<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Warming hijinks: we&#8217;re screwed&#8230; and not in a light bulb way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neoconnews.com/2008/04/16/global-warming-hijinks-were-screwed-and-not-in-a-light-bulb-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neoconnews.com/2008/04/16/global-warming-hijinks-were-screwed-and-not-in-a-light-bulb-way/</link>
	<description>An entertaining take on the world's absurd political news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:01:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neocon</title>
		<link>http://www.neoconnews.com/2008/04/16/global-warming-hijinks-were-screwed-and-not-in-a-light-bulb-way/comment-page-1/#comment-2144</link>
		<dc:creator>Neocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neoconnews.com/2008/04/16/global-warming-hijinks-were-screwed-and-not-in-a-light-bulb-way/#comment-2144</guid>
		<description>Not a horrible point on the surface but compare the projected economic impact of follies like Kyoto to the supposed benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a horrible point on the surface but compare the projected economic impact of follies like Kyoto to the supposed benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UK Landfill</title>
		<link>http://www.neoconnews.com/2008/04/16/global-warming-hijinks-were-screwed-and-not-in-a-light-bulb-way/comment-page-1/#comment-2138</link>
		<dc:creator>UK Landfill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neoconnews.com/2008/04/16/global-warming-hijinks-were-screwed-and-not-in-a-light-bulb-way/#comment-2138</guid>
		<description>Surely now the world is in recession and we need new jobs you should be a tiny bit grateful for the global warming &#039;myth&#039; as Obama claims he will be investing in green technology and creating lots of new jobs in the sector... all this at a time where jobs are getting really tough to find.  Am I to cynical?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely now the world is in recession and we need new jobs you should be a tiny bit grateful for the global warming &#8216;myth&#8217; as Obama claims he will be investing in green technology and creating lots of new jobs in the sector&#8230; all this at a time where jobs are getting really tough to find.  Am I to cynical?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tatiana</title>
		<link>http://www.neoconnews.com/2008/04/16/global-warming-hijinks-were-screwed-and-not-in-a-light-bulb-way/comment-page-1/#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatiana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neoconnews.com/2008/04/16/global-warming-hijinks-were-screwed-and-not-in-a-light-bulb-way/#comment-1399</guid>
		<description>Searched global warming in msn but for some reason found this page.great info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Searched global warming in msn but for some reason found this page.great info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neocon</title>
		<link>http://www.neoconnews.com/2008/04/16/global-warming-hijinks-were-screwed-and-not-in-a-light-bulb-way/comment-page-1/#comment-1363</link>
		<dc:creator>Neocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neoconnews.com/2008/04/16/global-warming-hijinks-were-screwed-and-not-in-a-light-bulb-way/#comment-1363</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Don\’t blame me - I voted for Ron Paul.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, he&#039;s better than Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Don\’t blame me &#8211; I voted for Ron Paul.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, he&#8217;s better than Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad3378</title>
		<link>http://www.neoconnews.com/2008/04/16/global-warming-hijinks-were-screwed-and-not-in-a-light-bulb-way/comment-page-1/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator>brad3378</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 01:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neoconnews.com/2008/04/16/global-warming-hijinks-were-screwed-and-not-in-a-light-bulb-way/#comment-1357</guid>
		<description>It\&#039;s a shame that our Party nominated John McCain this year.
He supports the same Carbon Credit bull crap that Obama does.

More of the same democratic policies of fear mongering.
Don\&#039;t blame me - I voted for Ron Paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It\&#8217;s a shame that our Party nominated John McCain this year.<br />
He supports the same Carbon Credit bull crap that Obama does.</p>
<p>More of the same democratic policies of fear mongering.<br />
Don\&#8217;t blame me &#8211; I voted for Ron Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neocon</title>
		<link>http://www.neoconnews.com/2008/04/16/global-warming-hijinks-were-screwed-and-not-in-a-light-bulb-way/comment-page-1/#comment-1349</link>
		<dc:creator>Neocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neoconnews.com/2008/04/16/global-warming-hijinks-were-screwed-and-not-in-a-light-bulb-way/#comment-1349</guid>
		<description>The link you just provided states flatly that we did not provide Saddam with chemical or biological weapons.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;I don&#039;t think it would be accurate to say the United States government deliberately provided seed stocks to the Iraqis&#039; biological weapons programs,&quot; said Jonathan Tucker, a former U.N. biological weapons inspector.

&quot;But they did deliver samples that Iraq said had a legitimate public health purpose, which I think was naive to believe, even at the time.&quot; &lt;/blockquote&gt;

The same claim is ironically presented in Moore&#039;s &#039;Dude where&#039;s my country&#039;, followed quickly by documentation stating the same thing your link does-- that we did not provide him with WMD. Saddam was an ally, so Iraq had the same sort of privileges that other nations medical programs had.

You&#039;re mistaken about both support for the war and the context of what I said. I stated that Saddam&#039;s WMD programs were well-documented and it was an accepted fact in the intelligence community. I never said that the consensus response was war. However, it wasn&#039;t just the brits who backed us.

Attacking Saudi Arabia makes no sense either, unless you&#039;ve now endorsed the idea that nationality somehow equates directly to the actions of an individual? In that case shouldn&#039;t we be profiling anyone who is a Muslim, as a shocking 100% of the 9/11 attackers were Muslim. It&#039;s ludicrous.

Yes, why should we worry about countries invading each other if most people can&#039;t find them on a map, right? It&#039;s not like small conflicts have ever boiled over to start two world wars or anything. I would talk to Viktor Yushchenko, Mikheil Saakashvili, or Alexander Litvinenko before I put Russia in the &#039;nothing to worry about&#039; column.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link you just provided states flatly that we did not provide Saddam with chemical or biological weapons.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t think it would be accurate to say the United States government deliberately provided seed stocks to the Iraqis&#8217; biological weapons programs,&#8221; said Jonathan Tucker, a former U.N. biological weapons inspector.</p>
<p>&#8220;But they did deliver samples that Iraq said had a legitimate public health purpose, which I think was naive to believe, even at the time.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>The same claim is ironically presented in Moore&#8217;s &#8216;Dude where&#8217;s my country&#8217;, followed quickly by documentation stating the same thing your link does&#8211; that we did not provide him with WMD. Saddam was an ally, so Iraq had the same sort of privileges that other nations medical programs had.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re mistaken about both support for the war and the context of what I said. I stated that Saddam&#8217;s WMD programs were well-documented and it was an accepted fact in the intelligence community. I never said that the consensus response was war. However, it wasn&#8217;t just the brits who backed us.</p>
<p>Attacking Saudi Arabia makes no sense either, unless you&#8217;ve now endorsed the idea that nationality somehow equates directly to the actions of an individual? In that case shouldn&#8217;t we be profiling anyone who is a Muslim, as a shocking 100% of the 9/11 attackers were Muslim. It&#8217;s ludicrous.</p>
<p>Yes, why should we worry about countries invading each other if most people can&#8217;t find them on a map, right? It&#8217;s not like small conflicts have ever boiled over to start two world wars or anything. I would talk to Viktor Yushchenko, Mikheil Saakashvili, or Alexander Litvinenko before I put Russia in the &#8216;nothing to worry about&#8217; column.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.neoconnews.com/2008/04/16/global-warming-hijinks-were-screwed-and-not-in-a-light-bulb-way/comment-page-1/#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neoconnews.com/2008/04/16/global-warming-hijinks-were-screwed-and-not-in-a-light-bulb-way/#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>quote:&quot;that Saddam positively had chemical and biological weapons&quot; well we knew that too well as we had given those to him, huh?!
We could have known if the stock we gave him was all used up or not. Just tak into consideration all people he killed during the war in Iran using these chemicals. http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2002-09-30-iraq-ushelp_x.htm

In relation to your comment that the &quot;consensus was just as large as it is for anthropogenic global warming– if not stronger&quot; I&#039;d strongly disagree with this. As I stated before most of the world know that global warming is happening and that we contribute a lot to it. In the case of the iraq war it was only us the US who wanted to go there (besides our great friends the Brits) - so we against the rest of the world. I think there is a huge difference.
In addition I don&#039;t understand why we aren&#039;t fighting in Saudi Arabia then? I mean most of the terrorists were from there and they don&#039;t have a democracy either? This video should shed some more light on this - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF5MhzFdBsU

Do you wanna see someone else who is causing or trying to cause hysteria and trying to profit from it?! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nA1MwOE86U
Using these war pictures in an ad is really bad. Its just causing hysteria and creating a fear about something that doesn&#039;t have to be feared - Russia. On top of that most of us won&#039;t be able to find Georgia on a map (besides the US Georgia) anyways.

Thanks,
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quote:&#8221;that Saddam positively had chemical and biological weapons&#8221; well we knew that too well as we had given those to him, huh?!<br />
We could have known if the stock we gave him was all used up or not. Just tak into consideration all people he killed during the war in Iran using these chemicals. <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2002-09-30-iraq-ushelp_x.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2002-09-30-iraq-ushelp_x.htm</a></p>
<p>In relation to your comment that the &#8220;consensus was just as large as it is for anthropogenic global warming– if not stronger&#8221; I&#8217;d strongly disagree with this. As I stated before most of the world know that global warming is happening and that we contribute a lot to it. In the case of the iraq war it was only us the US who wanted to go there (besides our great friends the Brits) &#8211; so we against the rest of the world. I think there is a huge difference.<br />
In addition I don&#8217;t understand why we aren&#8217;t fighting in Saudi Arabia then? I mean most of the terrorists were from there and they don&#8217;t have a democracy either? This video should shed some more light on this &#8211; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF5MhzFdBsU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF5MhzFdBsU</a></p>
<p>Do you wanna see someone else who is causing or trying to cause hysteria and trying to profit from it?! <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nA1MwOE86U" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nA1MwOE86U</a><br />
Using these war pictures in an ad is really bad. Its just causing hysteria and creating a fear about something that doesn&#8217;t have to be feared &#8211; Russia. On top of that most of us won&#8217;t be able to find Georgia on a map (besides the US Georgia) anyways.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
