Apr
16
2008
Global Warming hijinks: we’re screwed… and not in a light bulb way
Posted by: Neocon in 2008 Race, Nutter Butters, Super Scary Global Warming, tags: al gore, bush, Economy, freaks, global warming hoax, global warming hype, global warming news, jerk, matter of time, maverick, McCain, nutter, qando, white houseFirst we heard word that Bush was going to completely give into the Global Warming nutter butters. Now we hear that it might not be as bad as we’d feared. Either way, even if we win the White House this year, it’s only a matter of time before the eco-freaks cripple this country’s economy thanks to McCain’s maverick streak. And this jerk will get rich(er) off it.
Feel better? Yeah, me either. Here’s some other global warming news.
QandO covers how we might have a chance to yell stop at an upcoming conference. Not like it will help much.
More from the Corner. Another QandO, China takes the top CO2 spot. Let’s see if they cut back.
I don’t understand why you folks have to dismantle global warming like you do. I mean that it is happening is a pure fact. The causes (e.g. CO2, pollution, etc.) ‘have been endorsed by at least 30 scientific societies and academies of science, including all of the national academies of science of the major industrialized countries’.
Could you post a few good answers why global warming is not happening and we can simply ignore it? Down here in Georgia we had so little water like we have never before and Lake Lanier ran almost out of water. So I am not going to ignore it any longer as the signs are too obvious to miss.
I mean when Bush/Cheney announced that Iraq had WMD and was linked to Al-Qaeda (both have been officially WRONG) ya’ll jumped up got your guns and ran out the house towards iraq.
I call this double standards
If you read through the website, you can see that I don’t deny that the globe is warming (despite the recent cooling trends we’ve seen since the early 2000s). The question is whether it is anthropogenic or not. I’ve actively looked into this issue and I’m completely unconvinced. That doesn’t mean that I would disparage the intent of people who believe it is caused primarily by man, I’m sure they’re trying to do what they believe is best for the planet, but I disagree. However, I would call into question the legitimacy and the character of the most radical proponents like Al Gore, someone who is actively profiting from the hysteria he is inducing.
As far as Iraq goes, the intelligence and consensus was just as large as it is for anthropogenic global warming– if not stronger given that Saddam positively had chemical and biological weapons. It was just a matter of whether he had destroyed the stocks he had or if he had continued to produce them. Of course if we want to go all the way back to the beginning of the Iraq war then we need to examine what a consensus of learned people really means.